As this is the first council elected via a hybrid system, I thought it would be interesting to review the last campaign season. Headed into the last election, I was interested to see whether the new system would make the financial barrier to seeking city office a bit more palatable for those seeking district seats.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/07e37/07e375116ce14a82792679ff077690b9bac5a7e2" alt=""
The results may or may not be surprising, depending on your expectations:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/544f5/544f56ef8fe1c9d26c4e27add85de8da52a9d87b" alt=""
Clearly, there were few bargains to be found in running a district campaign. It remains to be seen whether these levels of spending were necessary, or are merely a holdover from the traditional at-large campaign mindset. Again, this was the first election under a new system and adjustments are likely.
Also of note, with few exceptions, winning district candidates overwhelmingly outspent their opponents:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c9f88/c9f88e047c1ce43a68878839ef6b9881835fefb1" alt=""
[Campaign spending calculated from 4/1/21 to 11/30/21 using data from OCPF]